Good Security

Service

Government Standards Gap Assessment

See what stands between the business and NZISM, PSR, HISO, or similar public-sector expectations before an audit or supplier review exposes the gap.

Usually starts in Assurance
Book a Free Consultation Take the 2-Minute Security Scorecard

Typical deliverable

Framework Compliance Matrix

A complete control-by-control assessment showing compliance status (Compliant, Partially Compliant, Non-Compliant, Not Applicable) with evidence references.

Framework Compliance Matrix

A complete control-by-control assessment showing compliance status (Compliant, Partially Compliant, Non-Compliant, Not Applicable) with evidence references.

Gap Analysis & Findings Report

Detailed report of all identified gaps with risk ratings, business impact assessment, and specific guidance on how to fix each finding.

In practice

A typical output is a control-by-control matrix showing where the business already meets the target standard, where evidence is weak, what still needs building, and which actions will close the biggest audit or supplier-review gaps first.

The pressure

A government client, tender, or audit path needs proof against a named standard and the gaps are not yet clear.

You leave with a clear gap view against the chosen standard, where evidence already exists, and what still needs to close.

Government work gets harder when the business cannot show which standards apply, where it already meets them, and where the gaps still sit. This assessment gives a clear view before an audit, tender, or supplier review turns compliance into a fire drill.

Good Security checks the relevant requirements, tests current evidence and control status, and leaves you with a gap view, an improvement sequence, and a practical explanation of which fixes cover multiple obligations at once.

What you leave with

What you walk away with.

These are the deliverables and working records the team should be able to use once the work is complete.

Framework Compliance Matrix

A complete control-by-control assessment showing compliance status (Compliant, Partially Compliant, Non-Compliant, Not Applicable) with evidence references.

Gap Analysis & Findings Report

Detailed report of all identified gaps with risk ratings, business impact assessment, and specific guidance on how to fix each finding.

Improvement Priority Plan

Sequenced action plan addressing critical gaps first, with estimated effort levels and suggested implementation timelines.

Cross-Framework Mapping (Leadership)

Visual mapping of overlapping controls across multiple frameworks, identifying where a single control implementation satisfies multiple requirements.

What that looks like in practice

A typical output is a control-by-control matrix showing where the business already meets the target standard, where evidence is weak, what still needs building, and which actions will close the biggest audit or supplier-review gaps first.

What should be easier after this lands

What should be easier after this.

These are the outcomes owners, managers, or leaders should notice after the deliverable starts being used.

  • The business knows which government standards really apply and which ones do not.
  • Audit and supplier-review gaps are visible early enough to plan, not just react.
  • Overlap across frameworks is easier to use, which cuts duplicate remediation work.
  • Evidence and ownership are easier to present when public-sector scrutiny starts.

What this service is designed to do

  • framework gap assessment
  • evidence-backed gap view
  • prioritised remediation sequence

How the work moves

How the work gets done.

You should know what happens first, what gets reviewed, and what lands with the business at the end.

1

Confirm the target standard

We pin down which framework, control set, and boundary matter for the work you are trying to win or keep.

2

Assess what is already in place

Good Security reviews current evidence, control status, and operating practices against the relevant requirements.

3

Prioritise the shortfall

The gaps are turned into a sequence that shows what needs to be fixed first and what can be staged.

4

Deliver the remediation view

You receive the gap matrix, the improvement plan, and a practical walkthrough of how to close the distance.

FAQ

Common questions.

These answers are here to make the next decision easier, not to hide the real scope.

When does Government Standards Gap Assessment make sense? +

A government client, tender, or audit path needs proof against a named standard and the gaps are not yet clear. Use this when a government-facing requirement is already real and the business needs an evidence-led answer, not a vague framework discussion.

What changes after Government Standards Gap Assessment is delivered? +

You leave with a clear gap view against the chosen standard, where evidence already exists, and what still needs to close.

What often comes next

What usually comes next.

These services are often paired with this engagement when the business needs a broader operating model, more evidence, or stronger follow-through.

Security Assessment & Baseline

Security Baseline Assessment

See where the business is exposed, what matters first, and what should be fixed before the next review, buyer question, or renewal lands.

Compliance & Audit Defence

Multi-Standard Compliance Mapping

Reduce duplicate compliance work by showing where one control satisfies multiple frameworks, customers, or audit demands.

Need to turn this into a practical next step?

We will help you decide whether this is the right engagement, what the business should expect to receive, and where it fits in the wider programme.

Book a Free Consultation Take the 2-Minute Security Scorecard